Warning, the quote below has bad language, the misspellings are the authors.
If you focus on them, you’re missing his point. @Aja_Cortes, a fitness bro on Twitter explained what he thinks the problem with conservatives is:
Conservatives lose because they have no sexual or creative energy
None.
Its an impotent movement
Nothing sexy, no Art because conservative "values" are whitebread LARPing & there is nothing to create artistry with
Even the name is peak Loserdom, no adventure, no badassery
The Left gets protests
they get LAID and fuck afterwards
They get hot and attractive people making statements
They actually CANCEL things and ruin people, they make things happen for what they believe in
Whats the "right" do?
"But we have principles!"
Fuckingg NOTHING.
The right had DECADES when they actually had cultural power
What did you do?
Build beautiful buildings?
Subsidize arts?
Do ANYTHING that could be considered cool?
Nope. Its a bunch of squares sucking the ghost dick of Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan
SQUARES
You seen the dudes that are Conservative "Youth" leaders?
Do any of them incline bench and look like they FUCK?
Hell no
Its a bunch of pencil necked dweebs
I know militant lesbians with more masculine energy and balls
Steinem argued in the 1980s that opposing abortion is actually a secret form of Nazism, and she repeats the argument in an interview below:
Well, the new generation of reader is instructing me by saying that these essays are still relevant …. on a more serious note, to put it mildly, is why Hitler was actually elected, and he was elected and he campaigned against abortion. I mean, that was — he padlocked the family planning clinics. Okay, so that is still relevant in the terms of the right wing. So there were very few things, actually, that I had to take out.
Conservatives rarely conserve anything. This is well known.
What they like to do is make conservative cases for making society worse. For instance:
henever you find an article that begins with the title, “The Conservative Case” for or against something, lock your door, check your wallet, and grab your gun. You know what’s coming is an unadulterated sell-out of everything “conservatism” purports to hold dear.
I don't watch the Big Bang Theory and I intentionally don't watch shows with laugh tracks. BBT has a laugh track and I just decided to watch a bit of it without the laugh track:
Very little to none of that is funny. But why are there laugh tracks? Well, they work. People laugh out loud more, even when they rate material just as funny as the group that has no laugh track and does not laugh out loud. But I think more work needs to be done on longer exposure to laugh tracks. Even brief interventions can change views, which is upstream from behavior. Also, parody works wonders at promoting negative viewpoints about the target of the parody, which can ultimately change behavior.
I cannot tell if this is the most powerful piece of journalism ever written or a recently discovered H.P. Lovecraft fragment, but here is a "twittorthred" by one Bronze Aged Mantis:
As promised I release a dark secret on New Year's Eve...the most grotesque plans in motion revealed to me by mole inside Karl Rove office, regarding what he, Huber, the Utah deep state, and establishment GOP is planning ...what Romney thinks he has masterminded
The fact that all modern public discourse excludes the divine.
As a modern child grows up, he becomes socialised, he becomes trained in modern public discourse of many kinds: school work, everything to do with the mass media, sports, pastimes, hobbies... and all of these exclude the divine.
It Just Isn't There. The lexicon of objects that function in the system exclude the divine; the causality of the system excludes the divine.
As the child reaches adolescence - these modes of thought become more dominant, and they become habitual to the extent of being simply taken for granted; and eventually they become so habitual as to be extremely difficult to break out from.
This process is exacerbated in the world of work, where nearly all jobs exclude the divine (in whatever social system, the law, medicine, science, government, politics, police, the military, engineering - as well as the mass media and academia) - becoming competent means internalising these 'materialist' ways of thinking; thus, excluding the divine.
Socrates was so useful in all circumstances and in all ways, that any observer gifted with ordinary perception can see that nothing was more useful than the companionship of Socrates, and time spent with him in any place and in any circumstances. The very recollection of him in absence brought no small good to his constant companions and followers; for even in his light moods they gained no less from his society than when he was serious.
I read a great quote in a meme. So I decided to find its source. It had a philosopher's touch:
Live your life like you're 80 looking back on your teenage years. You know if your dad calls you at eight in the morning and asks if you want to go to breakfast? As a teenager you're like no, I want to sleep. As an 80 year old looking back, you have that breakfast with your dad. It's just little things like that that helped me when I was a teenager in terms of making the choices you won't regret later.
Together we will make America Great Again, better than ever before.
This political slogan is usually viewed as either a Nazi bigot’s racist screed against all truth and goodness or as an aspiration to be achieved in the unholy walls and halls of DC.
It’s a phrase and sentiment that is not unique to Trump and I recall hearing Bill Clinton say it several times and saw a Reagan speech in class in which Ronald Reagan also said it: