I saw this article below. So I screen capped it to make sure nobody thought I edited it:
One of the most amusing elements of the last few years has been watching the political left and theological left, both of which find themselves appalled by the actual content of the Bible, try to use the Bible politically. Now, the right does it in its own unproductive way. But this article is particularly egregious because it’s evident that the person didn’t read the New Testament. For instance Jude attributes the plagues of Egypt to Jesus…and the gospels are only about third of the New Testament, and one of them contains almost no healing.
The question of refugees isn’t my point. That’s a really good question with a multilayered answer and hundreds of subquestions. My point is that hamfisted uses of the Bible which are meant to guilt trip Christians into political action aren’t effective and they’re disingenuous.